Robert Bork, fully Robert Heron Bork

Bork, fully Robert Heron Bork

American Judge, Supreme Court Nominee, Legal Scholar, Professor of Law at Yale University, Author

Author Quotes

Without adherence to the original understanding, even the actual Bill of Rights could be pared or eliminated. It is asserted nonetheless, and sometimes on high authority, that the judicial philosophy of original understanding is fatally defective in any number of respects.

When a judge assumes the power to decide which distinctions made in a statute are legitimate and which are not, he assumes the power to disapprove of any and all legislation, because all legislation makes distinctions.

The right to procreate is not guaranteed, explicitly or implicitly, by the Constitution.

This begins to demystify the presidency, and I'm not sure that's all bad.

Those who made and endorsed our Constitution knew man's nature, and it is to their ideas, rather than to the temptations of utopia, that we must ask that our judges adhere.

The opposition reflected the polarization that existed in this country.

The purpose that brought the fourteenth amendment into being was equality before the law, and equality, not separation, was written into the law.

The notion that Congress can change the meaning given a constitutional provision by the Court is subversive of the function of judicial review; and it is not the less so because the Court promises to allow it only when the Constitution is moved to the left.

The First Amendment is about how we govern ourselves - not about how we titillate ourselves sexually.

The major obstacle to a religious renewal is the intellectual classes, who are highly influential and tend to view religion as primitive superstition. They believe that science has left atheism as the only respectable intellectual stance.

Senators now demand that nominees state positions.

The conventional wisdom right now is that John Roberts will be confirmed just as the conventional wisdom in 1987 going into the hearings was that Robert Bork would be confirmed.... You never know what's going to happen at a hearing. I think that's been demonstrated time and again.

Now, however, the educational system has become the weapon of choice for modern liberals in their project of dismantling American culture.

Once the justices depart, as most of them have, from the original understanding of the principles of the Constitution, they lack any guidance other than their own attempts at moral philosophy, a task for which they have not even minimal skills. Yet when it rules in the name of the Constitution, whether it rules truly or not, the Court is the most powerful branch of government in domestic policy. The combination of absolute power, disdain for the historic Constitution, and philosophical incompetence is lethal.

Law is vulnerable to the winds of intellectual or moral fashion, which it then validates as the commands of our most basic concept.

Modernity, the child of the Enlightenment, failed when it became apparent that the good society cannot be achieved by unaided reason.

No church that panders to the zeitgeist deserves respect, and very shortly it will not get respect, except from those who find it politically useful, and that is less respect than disguised contempt.

It's a little late to develop a constitutional philosophy or begin to work it out when you're on the court already.

It's a demoralization of the conservative legal establishment, which is told in effect, 'If you're productive, if you stand up out there, you are not going to be chosen.'

If you know anything about bar association politics, it is not constitutional scholars who become president of the bar association. She has very little, if any, acquaintanceship with constitutional law, and it's a very hard thing to get a hold of if you go into the court and start wrestling with it. In fact, you're likely to get it very wrong.

In a constitutional democracy the moral content of law must be given by the morality of the framer or legislator, never by the morality of the judge.

If we recognize reward according to race, ethnicity, and sex as aspects or analogues of the blood principle, it is obvious how far the achievement principle has been discarded in America today in the name of equality.

I was thinking of resigning since I did not want to be perceived as a man who did the president's bidding to save my job. I have had some time to think about it since. I think I did the right thing.

If the children already born each have only two children themselves ... in twenty-seven to thirty-five years the population of the world will double.

I don't know if [the Democrats] can pull a filibuster on a Supreme Court nominee. That would be very unpopular, I think, with the American people. I think they would be in trouble.

Author Picture
First Name
Last Name
Bork, fully Robert Heron Bork
Birth Date
Death Date

American Judge, Supreme Court Nominee, Legal Scholar, Professor of Law at Yale University, Author