The idealists and visionaries, foolish enough to throw caution to the winds and express their ardor and faith in some supreme deed, have advanced mankind and have enriched the world.
It is necessary, therefore, that at least an important part of the development effort should by-pass the big cities and be directly concerned with the creation of an "agro-industrial structure" in the rural and small-town areas.
Nature, it has been said, abhors a vacuum, and when the available "spiritual space" is not filled by some higher motivation, then it will necessarily be filled by something lower Â– by the small, mean, calculating attitude to life which is rationalized in the economic calculus.
Socialists should insist on using the nationalized industries not simply to out-capitalize the capitalistsÂ—an attempt in which they may or may not succeedÂ—but to evolve a more democratic and dignified system of industrial administration, a more humane employment of machinery, and a more intelligent utilization of the fruits of human ingenuity and effort.
The arising of this error, so egregious and so firmly rooted, is closely connected with the philosophical, not to say religious, changes during the last three or four centuries in man's attitude to natureÂ…Modern man does not experience himself as a part of nature but as an outside force destined to dominate and conquer it. He even talks of a battle with nature, forgetting that, if he won the battle, he would find himself on the losing side.
The conventional wisdom of what is now taught as economics bypasses the poor, the very people for whom development is really needed. The economics of giantism and automation is a leftover of nineteenth-century conditions and nineteenth-century thinking and it is totally incapable of solving any of the real problems of today. An entirely new system of thought is needed, a system based on attention to people, and not primarily attention to goodsÂ—(the goods will look after themselves!). It could be summed up in the phrase, "production by the masses, rather than mass production."
Instead of asking, Â“Why does this happen Why do I feel left in the lurchÂ” we can ask Â“How does it happen that there are people who sing with such confidence, Â‘GodÂ’s strong name is our helpÂ’Â”
The irony here is that the rise of interest in spiritual direction almost certainly comes from the proliferation of role-defined activism in our culture. We are sick and tired of being slotted into a function and then manipulated with Scripture and prayer to do what someone has decided (often with the help of some psychological testing) that we should be doing to bring glory to some religious enterprise or other. And so when people begin to show up who are interested in us just as we are - our souls - we are ready to be paid attention to in this prayerful, listening, non-manipulative, nonfunctional way. Spiritual direction.
We must extend the boundaries of our lives beyond the dates enclosed by our birth and death and acquire an understanding of GodÂ’s way as something larger and more complete than the anecdotes in our private diaries. Otherwise, we will always be Â“mistaking a sore throat for a descent into hell.Â”
Literature is the right use of language irrespective of the subject or reason of utterance.
A child needs a mother more than all the things money can buy. Spending time with your children is the greatest gift of all.
Faithful heart may have forward tongue.